Okay, after we seemingly have unified our opinions on bug trackers, here's
the next quest:
Which version control system to take?
I've seen looking through the threads at least myrk and heatsink
mentioning this issue.
I'm _not_ against CVS, but i really think we should consider tracking at
least with one other tool: gnu arch.
No matter what, arch, svn or darcs will sooner or later supersede CVS and
other rcs-like vc-trackers. But that's not the reason I came up with arch
(tla), it's more the possibility of developing in a decentralised way.
And no matter what, even if the sxemacs project decides closedly against
another vc tracker, I _will_ personally track using arch.
Okay, now comments? ;)
hroptatyr
|