On 17-Aug-2004, Steve Youngs <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Johann Gunnar Oskarsson <johann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > It just seems ... evil to me, to actually make an info reader that
> > works around the crud in the generated info files, when it's possible
> > to generate better looking html (which'll be easier to render and so
> > on and so forth).
>
> Oh God! HTbloodyML for docs? As a customisable alternative option,
> sure no problem. As the default, no fucking way!
Certainly texinfo has its downfall, but with properly written texinfo,
the user can produce info, DVI, PDF, HTML, or even plain text. I guess
I am not sure why Johann thinks he's stuck with info, when he's got all
the original .texi files available?
--
;; Erik Arneson <erik@xxxxxxxx> GPG Key ID: 2048R/8B4CBC9C ;;
;; <http://www.transformason.org/> <http://erik.arneson.org/> ;;
;; "Civilization is only savagery silver-gilt." - H. Rider Haggard ;;
pgpMhqty1eRik.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|