sxemacs-devel
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Do we need to re-evaluate?

From: Steve Youngs <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Do we need to re-evaluate?
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:51:53 +1000
Organization: The SXEmacs Project
User-agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux)
* Sebastian Freundt <hroptatyr@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

  > Steve Youngs <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
  >> No, not about the project in general, just about where we fork from.
  >> 
  >> In the last week or two our good friend, Mr Wing has become very
  >> active, committing huge chunks of code and documentation.  I've been
  >> running 21.5 for the last couple of days and while it is still _very_
  >> slow for me, it has been remarkably stable.

  > Hm, for me it definitely _is_ stable enough, at least I can't realise mroe
  > crashes than a 21.4 instance does. I claim this is due to large amounts of
  > RAM on most of my boxes.

Yeah, I'd be happy too if I had > 2Gb RAM :-P

  > Okay for me it's the question (as I discussed with Steve already):
  > What will waste more time, backporting the features to 21.4 or
  > starting with 21.5 and making the lisp engine remarkably faster?

Johann said backporting would be easier.

  > Thus my great summary on all this: I cannot decide yet. :)

:-|

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
|                        In space,                         |
|             No one can hear you rip a stinky             |
|------------------------------------<steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>---|

Attachment: pgpqlxCKORjfB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>