Steve Youngs <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> * Johann Oskarsson <Johann> writes:
>
> > I don't want to be afraid you'll treat it as a merge request
> > each time I commit a check-point.
>
> Simple: If it lands on sxemacs-patches I treat it as a merge
> request. If you don't want something you commit to merged, _DON'T_
> send a commit log to the list.
>
> If you want a patch to be discussed (and not merged by me until
> possibly after the discussion), send it to sxemacs-devel.
Hmm, that's damn annoying becouse I'm not sure how I can control it
from the patch log to which list to send it...
*And* this contradicts to what we discussed about the Qt branch. You
*just* live to make my life more complicated, don't you? ;)
I've no trouble changing my automagic patch log mailings to the devel
list as such. I guess I'll need some sort of a commit wrapper...
> > I want the "merge request" to be on irc, in the commit log or on
> > devel.
>
> No.
Ok, I think I can deal with that.
*Pondering*
Johann
--
This line is left blank intentionally
|