-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Freundt <hroptatyr@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Steve Youngs <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
[snip]
Okay, next time I better change the subject, erm, and maybe wait until
there is some feedback. ;)
This time, Steve and me decided following:
- - The format specifier %u is nuked
- - The format specifiers %x %X and %o are renamed to base_converters
- a number object passed to one of these is converted to integer
- negative integers are allowed
> Am I missing something?
> Evgeny, do you need %u for eicq somewhere?
> Comments?
Still not commented, maybe I might add a question there:
Does anybody know (existing and not-imaginary existing) lisp code, which
uses %u as format specifier (of course in the meaning of %u or %lu of
C-sprintf)?
Sebastian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQFDfFONlMmhrILJOQ4RAun8AJdV0jsMiGNKauS7mOcK68z0nWMXAKCIfPK+
N3k0e4m3FKX+4TkFF7k7ZQ==
=5iJk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|